Failure verify SOP » History » Version 1
jun chen, 03/23/2025 12:39 AM
1 | 1 | jun chen | # Failure verify SOP |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | Mass failure can occur due to critical code change. |
||
4 | Or, if RD tried to introduce some fundamental enhance, which may break existing regression suite. |
||
5 | |||
6 | ## WARNING: |
||
7 | |||
8 | **A COMPLETE FAILURE REPORT IS NECESSARY |
||
9 | Direct re-golden is prohibited** |
||
10 | |||
11 | ## Procedure |
||
12 | |||
13 | Step 1: run regression and investigate log/reg.log |
||
14 | Step 2: try to understand what command failure and why |
||
15 | Step 3: if failure is caused by tiny variation, a correlation check is a must. |
||
16 | |||
17 | ## Discussion Demo: |
||
18 | |||
19 | Fix sanity check and re-golden related case. attachment:"resistance_sanity_check_regolden.docx" (ChunYan) |
||
20 | Feedback and regression failure sharing from Junc: vsupply_current_difference.pptx" |
||
21 | |||
22 | ## See below examples: |
||
23 | |||
24 | 1. PG mesh change, cause 60+ regression fail, each case has resistance and ir comparison to prove tiny variation. attachment:"node_reduction_investigation.pptx" (XiaoHu, DanPing) |
||
25 | 2. twf, em code change cause 7+ regression fail, each case has log tcl investigation and solution attachment:"pow_twf_em_fail_case.pptx" (LangYun, Heng) |
||
26 | 3. PG pad change, caused 20+ case fail, each fail needs detailed report and discussion attachment:"use_pad_phypin_as_pg_with_feedback.pptx" (Min) |